<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Refactoring Tip: Introduce Explaning Variables</title>
	<atom:link href="http://addictedtonew.com/archives/434/refactoring-tip-introduce-explaning-variables/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://addictedtonew.com/archives/434/refactoring-tip-introduce-explaning-variables/</link>
	<description>John Nunemaker\'s thoughts and such</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:19:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://addictedtonew.com/archives/434/refactoring-tip-introduce-explaning-variables/comment-page-1/#comment-175696</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 00:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addictedtonew.com/?p=434#comment-175696</guid>
		<description>I heard that whenever your testing for &#039;undefined&#039; you should use the === operator.

Just my 0.2

Nice Blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard that whenever your testing for &#8216;undefined&#8217; you should use the === operator.</p>
<p>Just my 0.2</p>
<p>Nice Blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron Booth</title>
		<link>http://addictedtonew.com/archives/434/refactoring-tip-introduce-explaning-variables/comment-page-1/#comment-171661</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron Booth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addictedtonew.com/?p=434#comment-171661</guid>
		<description>So true....and so much better than those &quot;if (x and y) or (a and b) .....&quot; type conditionals that sometimes you end up making. Good post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So true&#8230;.and so much better than those &#8220;if (x and y) or (a and b) &#8230;..&#8221; type conditionals that sometimes you end up making. Good post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akahn</title>
		<link>http://addictedtonew.com/archives/434/refactoring-tip-introduce-explaning-variables/comment-page-1/#comment-169788</link>
		<dc:creator>akahn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addictedtonew.com/?p=434#comment-169788</guid>
		<description>Very nice and clean. Clever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice and clean. Clever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

