<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Logging for the Lazy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://addictedtonew.com/archives/473/logging-for-the-lazy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://addictedtonew.com/archives/473/logging-for-the-lazy/</link>
	<description>John Nunemaker\'s thoughts and such</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 17:19:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Unibands</title>
		<link>http://addictedtonew.com/archives/473/logging-for-the-lazy/comment-page-1/#comment-186626</link>
		<dc:creator>Unibands</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addictedtonew.com/?p=473#comment-186626</guid>
		<description>I thought that was a neat little trick there until I noticed what Tim Snadden said, haha. Thanks anyway!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought that was a neat little trick there until I noticed what Tim Snadden said, haha. Thanks anyway!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jnunemaker</title>
		<link>http://addictedtonew.com/archives/473/logging-for-the-lazy/comment-page-1/#comment-174803</link>
		<dc:creator>jnunemaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addictedtonew.com/?p=473#comment-174803</guid>
		<description>@Tim - Huh. I could have swore I tried console.log before with multiple arguments and it didn&#039;t work. Seems to just fine now. I guess I can strip out the for loop. The only other benefit that my log function provides is that if you leave a stray log in your code it won&#039;t cause an error in browsers that do not have console.log as I check for its availability first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tim &#8211; Huh. I could have swore I tried console.log before with multiple arguments and it didn&#8217;t work. Seems to just fine now. I guess I can strip out the for loop. The only other benefit that my log function provides is that if you leave a stray log in your code it won&#8217;t cause an error in browsers that do not have console.log as I check for its availability first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Snadden</title>
		<link>http://addictedtonew.com/archives/473/logging-for-the-lazy/comment-page-1/#comment-174786</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Snadden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://addictedtonew.com/?p=473#comment-174786</guid>
		<description>console.log() can take more than one argument, so if you wanted to be more terse you could go...

log = console.log;
log(&#039;a&#039;,&#039;b&#039;,&#039;c&#039;);

Did I miss something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>console.log() can take more than one argument, so if you wanted to be more terse you could go&#8230;</p>
<p>log = console.log;<br />
log(&#8216;a&#8217;,'b&#8217;,'c&#8217;);</p>
<p>Did I miss something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

